Benchmark Evaluation of Resource Efficiency with Container Orchestration Policies in Edge Computing Clusters
Keywords:
Container Orchestration, Edge Computing, Resource Efficiency, Benchmark Evaluation, Software EngineeringAbstract
The proliferation of Internet of Things devices and the increasing demand for ultra-low latency applications have driven the paradigm shift from centralized cloud computing to distributed edge computing. In this context, containerization technologies have emerged as the standard for packaging and deploying microservices across heterogeneous edge environments. However, traditional container orchestration systems, originally designed for resource-abundant cloud datacenters, often exhibit significant inefficiencies when deployed on resource-constrained edge nodes. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark evaluation of various container orchestration policies to assess their impact on resource efficiency in edge computing clusters. By systematically analyzing different scheduling algorithms, including default spread policies, bin-packing strategies, and custom latency-aware algorithms, this study identifies the critical bottlenecks in current orchestration frameworks. Extensive experiments are conducted on a heterogeneous edge cluster testbed, evaluating metrics such as processor utilization, memory overhead, network bandwidth consumption, and application deployment latency. The findings reveal that default cloud-native orchestration policies incur substantial overhead and lead to suboptimal resource allocation at the edge. In contrast, topology-aware and resource-constrained scheduling policies can improve cluster efficiency and reduce deployment latency. This research provides valuable insights for the design of next-generation, edge-native orchestration frameworks tailored for distributed and heterogeneous environments.References
1. Maity, S.; Saikia, M.J. Large Language Models in Healthcare and Medical Applications: A Review. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 631. [ Central]
2. Tuttle, L., & Critchlow, K. (2025). Digital transformation in talent acquisition: Modern approaches to recruitment and selection. International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 7(1), 351–357.
3. Raja Santhi, A.; Muthuswamy, P. Pandemic, war, natural calamities, and sustainability: Industry 4.0 technologies to overcome traditional and contemporary supply chain challenges. Logistics 2022, 6, 81.
4. Tsiulin, S.; Reinau, K.H.; Hilmola, O.P.; Goryaev, N.; Karam, A. Blockchain-based applications in shipping and port management: A literature review towards defining key conceptual frameworks. Rev. Int. Bus. Strategy 2020, 30, 201–224.
5. Rodrigue, J.P.; Notteboom, T. Automation in container port systems and management. TR News 2021, 334, 20–25.
6. Su, M.; Su, Z.; Bae, S.H.; Li, J.; Park, K.S. An exploration of shipbuilding price prediction for container ships: An integrated model application of deep learning. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2025, 59, 101248.
7. Gust, G.; Neumann, D.; Flath, C.; Brandt, T.; Stroehle, P. How a Traditional Company Seeded New Analytics Capabilities. MIS Q. Exec. 2017, 16, 215–230.
8. Jing, H.; Zhang, S. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on ESG Performance of Manufacturing Firms: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Green Innovation. Systems 2024, 12, 499.
9. Cheng, W.; Li, C.; Zhao, T. The stages of enterprise digital transformation and its impact on internal control: Evidence from China. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 92, 103079.
10. Lombardi, R., & Secundo, G. (2021). The digital transformation of corporate reporting—A systematic literature review and avenues for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(5), 1179–1208.
11. Sutton, A., Papaioannou, D., & Booth, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
12. Ardolino, M.; Bino, A.; Ciano, M.P.; Bacchetti, A. Enabling digital capabilities with technologies: A multiple case study of manufacturing supply chains in disruptive times. Systems 2025, 13, 39.
13. Meng, T.; Dato Haji Yahya, M.H.; Ashhari, Z.M.; Yu, D. ESG performance, investor attention, and company reputation: Threshold model analysis based on panel data from listed companies in China. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20974.
14. Mamun, A.A.; Islam, M.S. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Global Supply Chains.
2024. Available online: https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/859583/Mamun_Islam.pdf?sequence=2 (accessed on 12 January 2025).
15. Boss, A.H. The international commercial use of electronic data interchange and electronic communications technologies. Bus. Lawyer 1991, 46, 1787–1802.
16. Nyamuryekung’e, S. Transforming ranching: Precision livestock management in the Internet of Things era. Rangelands 2024, 46, 13–22.
17. Chai, Q.; Nemecek, T.; Liang, C.; Zhao, C.; Yu, A.; Coulter, J.A.; Wang, Y.; Hu, F.; Wang, L.; Siddique, K.; et al. Integrated farming with intercropping increases food production while reducing environmental footprint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2106382118.
18. Hu, D.; Peng, Y.; Fang, T.; Chen, C.W. The effects of executives’ overseas background on enterprise digital transformation: Evidence from China. Chin. Manag. Stud. 2023, 17, 1053–1084.
19. Troia, S.; Borgianni, L.; Sguotti, G.; Giordano, S.; Maier, G. A comprehensive survey on software-defined wide area network. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2025, 28, 2805–2845.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.