Relationship of Legacy Migration Strategies and Risk Prioritization to Service Continuity in Public Administration Systems

Authors

  • Seung-Min Roh Department of Business Administration, School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Author

Keywords:

Service Continuity, Legacy Migration, Risk Prioritization, Public Administration, Digital Transformation

Abstract

The imperative to modernize public administration systems is increasingly driven by the need to enhance service delivery, improve security, and reduce the operational costs associated with maintaining obsolete technological infrastructures. However, the transition from legacy architectures to modern frameworks presents profound challenges, primarily concerning the maintenance of uninterrupted service continuity during the migration process. Public sector services, ranging from taxation processing to emergency response coordination, cannot tolerate significant downtime without incurring severe socioeconomic consequences. This paper provides a comprehensive academic examination of how service continuity can be explained and guaranteed through the meticulous selection of legacy migration strategies and the rigorous application of risk prioritization methodologies. By analyzing various migration paradigms, including phased rollouts, parallel adoption, and immediate cutover strategies, this research identifies the critical success factors that mitigate operational disruption. Furthermore, the study introduces a multidimensional risk prioritization framework tailored specifically for public administration environments, emphasizing the interplay between technical debt, stakeholder communication, and regulatory compliance. Through conceptual case studies and empirical analysis, the paper demonstrates that successful service continuity is not merely a byproduct of technical execution but is fundamentally rooted in strategic risk management and institutional readiness. The findings offer actionable insights for public sector leaders and system architects, providing a robust blueprint for navigating the complexities of digital transformation while safeguarding essential public services.

References

1. Goswami, S.S.; Mondal, S.; Sarkar, S.; Gupta, K.K.; Sahoo, S.K.; Halder, R. Artificial intelligence-enabled supply chain management: Unlocking new opportunities and challenges. Artif. Intell. Appl. 2025, 3, 110–121.

2. Jović, M.; Tijan, E.; Vidmar, D.; Pucihar, A. Factors of digital transformation in the maritime transport sector. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9776.

3. Kamruzzaman, M.; Daniell, K.A.; Chowdhury, A.; Crimp, S.; James, H. How can agricultural extension and rural advisory services support agricultural innovation to adapt to climate change in the agriculture sector? Adv. Agric. Dev. 2020, 1, 48–62.

4. Smerichevska, S.V.; Prodanova, L.; Yakushev, O. Digitization of logistics and supply chain management. Intellectualization Logist. Supply Chain Manag. 2024, 26, 113–123.

5. Bocayuva, M. Cybersecurity in the European Union port sector in light of the digital transformation and the COVID-19 pandemic. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2021, 20, 173–192.

6. United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables; Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2017.

7. Prause, L. Digital agriculture and labor: A few challenges for social sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5980.

8. Kő, A., Fehér, P., & Szabó, Z. (2019). Digital transformation—A Hungarian overview. Economic and Business Review, 21(3), 7–293.

9. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions Gap Report 2024: No More Hot Air … Please! With a Massive Gap Between Rhetoric and Reality, Countries Draft New Climate Commitments; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2024.

10. Punt, E.; Monstadt, J.; Frank, S.; Witte, P. Navigating cyber resilience in seaports: Challenges of preparing for cyberattacks at the Port of Rotterdam. Digit. Policy Regul. Gov. 2023, 25, 420–438.

11. Vratimos, A. (2023). Digital transformation and COVID-19: The case of Greece. European Scientific Journal, 19(38), 55.

12. Heilig, L.; Schwarze, S.; Voß, S. An Analysis of Digital Transformation in the History and Future of Modern Ports.

2017. Available online: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/56dffdc6-c8db-42de-9c4e-8585cce8515c (accessed on 12 January 2025).

13. Wisner, J.D.; Tan, K.C.; Leong, G.K. Principles of Supply Chain Management; Cengage: Mason, OH, USA, 2008; pp. 95–110.

14. Christopher, M. Logistics and Supply Chain Management; Pearson: London, UK, 2022.

15. Kashem, M.A.; Shamsuddoha, M.; Nasir, T. Digital-era resilience: Navigating logistics and supply chain operations after COVID-19. Businesses 2024, 4, 1–17.

16. Finger, R.; Swinton, S.M.; El Benni, N.; Walter, A. Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2019, 11, 313–335.

17. Sheu, J.B. A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2004, 40, 39–61.

18. Pinder, D.; Slack, B. Shipping and Ports in the Twenty-First Century; Routledge: London, UK, 2012.

19. An, J. Maritime logistics and digital transformation with big data: Review and research trend. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2024, 9, 229–242.

20. Basulo-Ribeiro, J.; Pimentel, C.; Teixeira, L. Digital transformation in maritime ports: Defining smart gates through process improvement in a Portuguese container terminal. Future Internet 2024, 16, 350.

21. Andrade, M.J.; Jiménez-Morales, E.; Rodríguez-Ramos, R.; Martínez-Ramírez, P. Reuse of port industrial heritage in tourist cities: Shipyards as case studies. Front. Archit. Res. 2024, 13, 164–183.

22. Jacobs, W.A.A. Political Economy of Port Competition: Institutional Analyses of Rotterdam, Southern California and Dubai; Academic Press Europe: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles